A- de 2016
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Gabriel Eduardo Mendoza Martelo
✓Claimant Arnoldo Moreno Villalobos·Respondent Tecnioriente Well Services An Generation Sas Y Otras
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Competencia a prevención
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Conflicto de competencia suscitado entre el Juzgado Cuarto Administrativo Oral de Villavicencio y el Juzgado Laboral del Circuito de Arauca.
Se reitera la posición de la Corporación respecto a la definición del régimen de competencias en materia de acciones de tutela y del principio pro homine.
Se resuelve el asunto con la remisión del expediente al mencionado Juzgado de Villavicencio para que, de manera inmediata, tramite y adopte la decisión de fondo a que haya lugar dentro de la solicitud de amparo formulada.
What it decided
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
See the operative part (5 points)
- PRIMERO. DEJAR SIN EFECTOS el auto del 11 de septiembre de 2015 proferido por el Juzgado
- Cuarto. Administrativo Oral de Villavicencio, dentro del expediente ICC-2408.
- SEGUNDO. REMITIR al Juzgado
- Cuarto. Administrativo Oral de Villavicencio el expediente ICC-2408, para que, de manera inmediata, tramite y adopte la decision de fondo a que haya lugar, dentro de la accion de tutela formulada por Arnoldo Moreno Villalobos contra Tecnioriente Well Services and Generation S.A.S, Occidental de Colombia LLC, Positiva ARL y Saludcoop EPS.
- TERCERO. ORDENAR que, por Secretaria General, se comunique la decision adoptada en esta providencia a las partes y al Juzgado Laboral del Circuito de Arauca.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.